Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
About Me
- Matthew Ebert
- I teach Humanities during the year in Academy Two of the Lilla G. Frederick Pilot Middle School.
30 comments:
I strongly agree that Steve Harmon is innocent from murder. He had nothing to do with the pulling of the trigger that killed Mr. Nesbitt. Why?
He didn't pull the trigger, he was just a look out.
i think no, but he is still guitly because he could of stopped them. he also was guilty by association. nd should go to jail for something other then murder.
No he isn't guilty. Like the question said he was involved in the robbery. Killing and robbing isn't the same
thing. I could be robbing the store unarmed and someone comes and shoots him. It wasn't me so why should it be him?
I think Steve is guilty because he might have not pull the trigger but he was involved in the robbery so either way he commit a crime and should pay the price for robbery and should be in jail for the robber,but the trigger pulling he is innocent of that crime.
Steve was not the person that pulled the trigger on Mr.Nesbitt, but I still think that He is guilty in one part in the crime, but not guilty in the other part of the crime. I say that he was guilty in one part because he played a part in the robbery and should have known better than to rob a store. I say that he is not guilty in one part of the crime because he didn't pull the trigger, he did not know that they would have killed someone in the crime. This is why i think he is guilty and then not guilty.
I don't think that he is Guilty of murder because he was hanging out with some of his friends and i guess he was the last one left behind and he's the one who got arrested for something that he did not do,so i think that he's Innocent.
NO because if he didn't pull the trigger or if he wasn't the one that made the plan then he shouldn't be charged for it. Even if he was involved in it then he shouldn't be considered guilty he should just be tried for something else. He wasn't the one that was robbing or that pulled the trigger so he is INNOCENT.
i think he is guilty because he still was about to attempt a murder. so he doesn't have to go to jail for murder, but he should go to jail for attempted murder.
I think that Steve Harmon is innocent because it seems like he did not commit murder because if he was the lookout then he was not the one who was carrying the weapon i think that the person that should be tried for murder is the one who was carrying the weapon.
Yes he is guilty because even though he didn't pull the trigger he was still with them and he was participating in the robbery that went wrong.
If Steve didn't pull the trigger, he should be getting charged with B&E and robbery. The one who shot Nesbit should be the one getting charged with murder. He was just the look out so he should get charged with conspiracy. Thats what he says the look out hopefully he gets the right charge he deserves he should have just left. He should have just left so that he wouldn't have got caught. He is now on trial because he was the look out. Now he had his freedom took from him and his dignity. Now that he is in jail he is noticing that it isn't safe in the inside. Some of those people are actually there for murder, its not a game, its not reputation; its real life.
If Steve is involved in the robbery, Yes he is guilty of murder because he was with the people who killed Mr.Nesbitt. Also he was involved in a robbery in which he knew that he was guilty of robbery,plus "killing someone."
I think that he is not guilty for murder because he was not the one who killed Mr. Nesbitt. He was part of the whole crime but he was not the one who pulled he trigger. So he should not get charged with murder.
No i don't be leave that he is guilty
because they don't have prof. That he was involved in the murder. All he did was look for mints.
I think Steve is innocent because he didn't kill anyone. He just went to see if the coast was clear.
Steve is not guilty because he didnt do the crime. Yes he was part of it but he didnt kill him.
No, I don't think Steve should be held for murder, because he did not do the shooting nor did he know that the shooting was going to happen. I think still think that he should be charged with something even if he didn't do anything that had to do with the death of Mr. Nesbitt.
I think that Steve is not guilty.I don't think he is guilty because he is not the one that pulled the trigger.He had nothing to do with him dying(the shooting),he was just the look out and that was it.
I strongly believe that Steve is not guilty for murder.Even though he was there does not mean that he should be charged for murder.Steve was not the one who pulled the trigger.He is also not the one who was the speaker.Steve is a innocent man.Getting to get mints is not a crime.
Steve Harmon should be innocent because he wasn't the one that killed Mr.Nesbitt Steve was only the look out.
If Steve was inside the store just to get some mint and then when he left then all of a sudden there was a murder. My answer is that I think that
Steve Harmon could be guilty in a certain way because he was involved in it but it doesn't mean that he should get charged for it. so my answer he can be innocent in my eyes and that he has almost a full life ahead of him.
I think Steve is innocent because he was not involved in any crime that should send him to jail for life. Steve is innocent because all he did was walk into the store to buy some mints and tell somebody there were no cops.
Even if Steve was involved in the murder, whose to say that he pulled the trigger? No one exactly. If he didn't pull the trigger then he shouldn't be charged with murder, only because no one can say that he pulled the trigger if they didn't see him do it.
I think he is not guilty,because he did not pull the trigger, he was only at the scene of the crime and he got arrested.
I think he is not guilty,because he did not pull the trigger, he was only at the scene of the crime and he got arrested.
No, because if you are up for murder, and you did not do the killing it dose not make any since.
I think Steve is innocent because he was not the person that shot Mr. Nesbitt. Even though he was in the robbery he did not shoot Mr.Nesbitt so they shouldn't point fingers at him they should find the real killer.
I think Steve is not guilty because all he did was walk in the store. He looked for some mints. Steve walked out.
I believe that Steve should not be guilty for murder because he simply didn't murder. if they want to charge someone for murder then they need to actually find the person that murdered in the crime. there for Steve Harmon should not get charged with murder!
I think Steve is not even part of the crime; because if he was, wouldn't he want in on the money and the cigarettes? Wouldn't he have accompanied them to go out eating? I think that some people who were involved saw Steve nearby and blamed him into it to get a lesser sentence
Post a Comment